Dec
Kenshin Himura:
Why do you need a new flu vaccination each year if the virus is not evolving?
Shouldn’t a single shot at birth be sufficient?
Evolution is the change in DNA from one generation to the next
The only contention may be exactly what the lineage is for each species. I.e. Human Evolution may be sketchy, but it did occur.
Reference thid Q:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ahr2ArGareSF81DDSYj_9Lbsy6IX?qid=20070615190856AAnvGl6&show=7#profile-info-5e171558491842a408b82affea576b29aa
My point is this: If evolution is the survival of the fittest (please don’t tell me this pillar of evolution has now changed), why on earth would an evolutionist consider he is evolutionally defective by submitting to a flu vaccine?
or for that matter any type of vaccination?
Is this not tantamount to an admission in doubt of evolutionary laws?
By default, the teaching of evolution is that only the fittest lifeforms survive, so why is it that people feel regrets if those that have defects suffer and die?
Is not this just evolution in action?
So in that line of reasoning, why do we have hospitals? Really would not it be cheaper and less a burden on society if we turned the evolutionally defectives out on the street?
BY the laws of survival of the fittest, why should you feel sorry for them?
Is it not their fault they are dying?
My whole point is that, a medical system with healthcare hospitals and soctors and such is contray to the concept of evolution.
If the person is weak, gets sick or has a terminal illness, why is it that you desire to cure them?
Evolutionally speaking, they are naturally being sellected to die.
So what would motivate you to interfere with nature?
Say Goodbye to Psoriasis









